|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]苏恩.语言初始状态对二语词汇复杂性发展的影响[J].厦门理工学院学报,2019,27(4):61-67.[doi:10.19697/j.cnki.16734432.201904010]
 SU En.Effects of Language Initial States on Lexical Complexity Developmentin L2 Writing[J].Journal of JOURNAL OF XIAMEN,2019,27(4):61-67.[doi:10.19697/j.cnki.16734432.201904010]
点击复制

语言初始状态对二语词汇复杂性发展的影响(PDF)
分享到:

《厦门理工学院学报》[ISSN:1673-4432/CN:35-1289/Z]

卷:
27
期数:
2019年第4期
页码:
61-67
栏目:
语言●文学
出版日期:
2019-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of Language Initial States on Lexical Complexity Development in L2 Writing
文章编号:
16734432(2019)04006107
作者:
苏恩
厦门理工学院外国语学院,福建 厦门 361024
Author(s):
SU En
School of International Languages, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
关键词:
二语书面语词汇复杂性语言初始状态动态系统理论
Keywords:
second language writing lexical complexity language initial states dynamic systems theory
分类号:
H3132;H3193
DOI:
10.19697/j.cnki.16734432.201904010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于动态系统理论,采用历时研究与案例研究相结合的方法考察学习者的语言初始状态不同对普通话单言者和闽-普双言者两组被试二语书面语词汇复杂性发展的影响。研究发现,普通话单言者和闽-普双言者均在词汇多样性和词汇复杂度方面的表现有所提高。闽-普双言者更能适应英语中的名词化现象,并且在此期间子系统呈涌现模式,出现吸态的次数较多,在大学阶段同等外部条件下更能够打破外语学习的僵化状态。社会母语经验、环境因素和语言因素等多方面所构成的初始状态对学习者后期的语言发展都会产生潜移默化的影响。
Abstract:
The present study aimed to investigate how the lexical complexity of L2 writing develops over time under the influence of different initial states on monoMandarin speakers and biMinMandarin speakers within the framework of Dynamic System Theory (DST). Results of analysis indicate that while Mandarin monolinguals and MinMandarin bilinguals have both improved in terms of lexical diversity and complexity, MinMandarin speakers have more abundant social mothertongue experiences, which helps them adapt better to nominalization in English and possess more attractor states in the emerge patterns of their subsystem. The initial state of social mother tongue experience, environmental factors and linguistic factors exert a subtle influence on the later language development of learners.

参考文献/References:

[1]BULT B,HOUSEN A.Conceptualizing and measuring shortterm changes in L2 writing complexity[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2014,26(4):4265. [2]郑咏滟.动态系统理论在二语习得研究中的应用:以二语词汇发展研究为例[J].现代外语,2011(3): 303309. [3]LARSENFREEMAN D,CAMERON L.Complex systems and applied linguistics[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2008:1347. [4]LARSENFREEMAN D.Ten “lessons” from complex dynamic systems theory:what is on offer[C]//DRNYEI Z,MACLNTYRE P D ,HENRY A .Motivational dynamics in language learning.Bristol: Multilingual Matters,2015:137162. [5]何冰艳.从DST看二语习得的多语转向[J].外国语文,2018(3): 8794. [6]詹先君.动态系统视角下的二语自我发展特征分[J].现代外语,2018(5): 648661. [7]常海潮.大学生英语学习动机变化机制研究:动态系统理论视角下的个案分析[J].外语电化教学,2018(5):3541,75. [8]许希阳,吴勇毅.复杂动态系统理论:对二语习得研究的反思[J].语言教学与研究,2015(2): 17. [9]王涛.动态系统理论视角下的复杂系统: 理论,实践与方法[J].天津外国语大学学报,2011(6): 815. [10]张振虹,杨啸鸣.动态系统理论框架下的二语习得实证研究述评[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2015(3): 156161. [11]王勃然,赵雯.近十年动态系统理论视域下我国二语习得研究: 现状与展望[J].外国语文,2019(5): 134140. [12]CANCINO H,ROSANSKY E,SCHUMANN J.The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers[C]//HATCH E M.Second language acquisition: a book of readings.Rowley: Newbury House,1978: 207230. [13]LARSENFREEMAN D.The emergence of complexity,fluency,and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English[J].Applied Linguistics,2006,27(4): 590619. [14]BULT B,HOUSEN A.Defining and operationalising L2 complexity[C]// HOUSEN A,KUIKEN F,VEDDER I.Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiencyInvestigating complexity,accuracy and fluency in SLA.Amsterdam: John Benjamins,2012:2146. [15]MAZGUTOVA D,KORMOS J.Syntactic and lexical development in intensive English for academic purposes program[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2015(29): 315. [16]STORCH N,TAPPER J.The impact of an EAP course on postgraduate writing[J].Journal of English for Academic Purposes,2009(3):207223. [17]KNOCH U,ROUSHAD A,OON S P,et al.What happens to ESL students writing after three years of study at an English medium university[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2015(28): 3952. [18]HALLIDAY M A K.Spoken and written language[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,1985:3740. [19]SEIFART F,MEYER R,ZAKHARKO T,et al.Crosslinguistic variation in the nountoverb ratio: exploring automatic tagging and quantitative corpus analysis[R].Nijmegen: DobeS Workshop “Advances in Documentary Linguistics”,2010: 1415. [20]NATION P.The BNC/COCA word family lists[EB/OL].(20120912)[20190623].https://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paulnation. [21]ZHENG Y.The complex,dynamic development of L2 lexical use: a longitudinal study on Chinese learners of English[J].System,2016(56): 4053. [22]徐丽华,蔡金亭.二语发展的动态路径:方法与技术述评[J].外语教学与研究,2014(1):144148. [23]郑咏滟.动态系统理论框架下的外语词汇长期发展[M].上海: 复旦大学出版社,2015:87121. [24]崔刚,柳鑫淼,杨莉.动态系统理论视角下英语学习者个体差异研究[M].北京: 清华大学出版社,2016: 6779. [25]梁爱民,张秀芳.复杂系统理论视角下二语动态发展研究综述[J].鲁东大学学报( 哲学社会科学版),2017(11): 3036.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:20190102 修回日期:20190711 基金项目:福建省社会科学规划项目(FJ2018C097) 通信作者:苏恩,女,副教授,硕士,研究方向为应用语言学,Email:suen610@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update: